Summary
A recent study, the Diuretic Comparison Project, found that chlorthalidone did not outperform hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in the prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension.1
More than 13,000 patients 65 years of age or older were randomized 1:1 to the continuation of daily HCTZ 25 mg or 50 mg or a change to chlorthalidone at the equivalent dose. As 95% of the enrolled patients were prescribed HCTZ 25 mg at baseline, the major comparison group was the equivalent dose of chlorthalidone 12.5 mg.
The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). At a median follow-up of 2.4 years, the incidence of MACE did not differ significantly between the HCTZ and chlorthalidone groups (10.0% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.45). Blood pressure trends were comparable between the two groups. Notably, hypokalemia was more common in the chlorthalidone group than the HCTZ group (6.0% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001).
Study limitations include generalizability to diverse populations (enrollees were 97% men, mean age 72 years, and 15% African American); the lower dosing range of diuretics at baseline, which limits extrapolation to higher doses; and the use of other prescribed antihypertensives used by patients in both groups, which may have influenced the results.2
Sources
1Ishani A, Cushman WC, Leatherman SM, et al. Chlorthalidone vs. hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension–cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(26):2401-2410. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2212270.
2Volpe M, Liuzzo G. The 'cold case' of chlorthalidone vs. hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension closed by the diuretic comparison project?. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(13):1110-1111. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad077.
Featured Authors

Colin Crowe, MD
Case Western Reserve University